Responsible Purchasing, Decarbonisation and Climate Adaptation: The Forces Reshaping Fashion in 2026

As the apparel industry enters 2026, three interconnected forces are moving from the margins to the centre of business decision-making: responsible purchasing practices, decarbonisation and climate adaptation. Together, they signal a shift away from headline commitments and towards operational resilience. The question is no longer whether brands understand the challenges ahead, but whether they are prepared to change how they buy, plan, and manage risk when conditions become uncomfortable.

Responsible purchasing as a resilience strategy

In 2026, responsible purchasing practices will no longer be framed primarily as a sustainability initiative. Instead, they are increasingly recognised as a core strategy for supply chain resilience. Trade disruption, tariffs, and geopolitical shocks are not new, but the industry’s tolerance for absorbing them is diminishing. Years of cost pressure have stripped out buffers, leaving suppliers and brands more exposed than ever.

What has changed is the growing body of evidence showing the upside of responsible purchasing. Data indicates that where brands apply more balanced buying practices such as realistic timelines, stable volumes, and transparent costing, suppliers report stronger relationships, greater operational stability and a better ability to absorb disruption. These practices are proving to be a form of risk management, not just ethical intent.

The next phase will not be defined by improved policies or commitments on paper. It will be defined by whether brands are willing to alter buying behaviour when market conditions tighten. Those that do not may find their supply chains increasingly unwilling and increasingly unable, to carry risk on their behalf.

Decarbonisation enters a credibility phase

By 2026, the apparel sector will be judged less on the climate targets it announces and more on whether those targets translate into measurable emissions reductions where they matter most. Around 1,800 suppliers across nine countries account for the majority of the industry’s carbon footprint. This concentration has driven a wave of activity, including efficiency upgrades and renewable energy pilots.

However, activity alone does not equal impact. Without stronger brand commitments, improved access to finance, and aligned measurement frameworks, progress risks plateauing well before 2030 targets come within reach. Decarbonisation is entering a credibility phase. The central question for 2026 will not be who is participating in climate initiatives, but who is willing to change the commercial and financial conditions that make large-scale emissions reduction possible.

Climate adaptation becomes operational reality

Climate adaptation will move from an emerging topic to a core operational concern in 2026. Extreme weather, water stress, and rising temperatures are already reshaping production realities in key sourcing regions. What is changing is that these impacts can no longer be treated as isolated or temporary disruptions.

Climate impacts now affect delivery timelines, worker safety, energy access and long-term sourcing decisions. Brands that continue to approach climate action solely through emissions targets risk being caught unprepared. Adaptation – planning for heat stress, water scarcity, and unpredictable weather – will become essential to maintaining production continuity.

Implications for smaller brands and designers

These shifts will have significant downstream effects, particularly for smaller brands and designer businesses. As Lee Green, Vice President of Marketing & Communications at Cascale, explains:

“In 2026, the shifts we’re seeing across responsible purchasing, decarbonisation, and climate adaptation will increasingly shape the conditions under which smaller brands and designer businesses operate, even if they are not the primary drivers of those changes.

Many of these businesses work with tighter margins, fewer sourcing options, and limited capacity to absorb disruption. That means industry-wide behaviours, particularly how larger brands plan, buy, and manage supplier relationships, have outsized downstream effects. Responsible purchasing practices, such as realistic timelines, volume stability, and transparent costing, are not just good practice; they directly influence whether suppliers can prioritise and support smaller customers when pressure increases.

Decarbonisation follows a similar pattern. Smaller brands are often sourcing from the same concentrated group of suppliers that account for a large share of the industry’s emissions. While they may not have the scale to run standalone climate programs, collective approaches, shared frameworks, and supplier-led solutions become critical. Without those, smaller players are more exposed to rising costs, regulatory pressure, and supply constraints they have little control over.

Climate adaptation adds another layer of risk. Extreme heat, water stress, and unpredictable weather are already affecting production reliability. For designer brands reliant on seasonal drops or limited runs, even minor disruption can have knock-on effects. In 2026, the brands most likely to endure will be those operating within more resilient supply networks, not necessarily those making the loudest climate claims.

Industry resources — such as Cascale’s Higg Index, exclusively available on Worldly, as well as Cascale’s Better Buying tools — aim to promote accountability and support more resilient global supply chains to help translate high-level expectations into more workable, evidence-based solutions in the year ahead.”

A defining year for the industry

Taken together, responsible purchasing, decarbonisation, and climate adaptation point to a defining moment for the fashion industry. In 2026, resilience will be built less through statements and targets, and more through everyday commercial decisions. Brands that align buying practices with long-term supplier viability, support meaningful emissions reduction, and prepare for climate disruption will be better positioned to navigate uncertainty. Those that do not may find that the risks they once outsourced to their supply chains can no longer be absorbed.

Image by Markus Spiske via pexels.com